Current:Home > MarketsAustralia decides against canceling Chinese company’s lease of strategically important port-DB Wealth Institute B2 Expert Reviews
Australia decides against canceling Chinese company’s lease of strategically important port
View Date:2025-01-11 12:53:06
CANBERRA, Australia (AP) — The Australian government announced Friday it has decided not to cancel a Chinese company’s 99-year lease on strategically important Darwin Port despite U.S. concerns that the foreign control could be used to spy on its military forces.
The Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet said it decided after an investigation of the eight-year-old lease that current monitoring and regulation measures are sufficient to manage security risks for critical infrastructure such as the port in the northern garrison city of Darwin.
“Australians can have confidence that their safety will not be compromised while ensuring that Australia remains a competitive destination for foreign investment,” it said in a statement.
Landbridge Industry Australia, a subsidiary of Rizhao-based Shandong Landbridge Group, signed the lease with the debt-laden Northern Territory government in 2015. That was three years after U.S. Marines began annual rotations through Darwin as part of the U.S. pivot to Asia.
The United States has raised concerns that Chinese port access in Darwin would enhance intelligence gathering on nearby U.S. and Australian military forces.
Landbridge said in a statement it hopes the decision will end security concerns.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s center-left Labor Party was in opposition at the time, and he had argued the lease should never have been allowed due to security concerns.
After Labor won elections last year, Albanese directed his department to investigate whether the lease should be changed or canceled.
The Australian decision comes before Albanese flies to Washington, D.C., next week to meet President Joe Biden.
Albanese also plans to soon become the first Australian prime minister to visit China in seven years.
Neil James, chief executive of the Australian Defense Association think tank, said regulation cannot solve the security risk posed by Chinese control of the port.
“Our problem is going to be if there’s ever any increased strategic tension with China and if we have to do something, even if it’s regulatory, it’s going to be escalatory and make the tension worse,” James said.
“The only way to avoid this problem is not to have the lease in the first place and they should bite the bullet and get rid of it,” James added.
Landbridge far outbid 32 other potential private investors with a 506 million Australian dollar ($360 million) offer for the aging infrastructure, the provincial government based in Darwin said at the time.
A month after the deal was announced, then U.S. President Barack Obama chided then Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull during a meeting in the Philippines over a lack of consultation with the United States.
Obama told Turnbull that Washington should have been given a “heads up about these sorts of things,” The Australian Financial Review newspaper reported, citing unidentified sources.
“Let us know next time,” Obama was quoted as saying.
Turnbull told reporters the port’s privatization had not been a secret.
“The fact that Chinese investors were interested in investing in infrastructure in Australia is also hardly a secret,” Turnbull said.
“And under our legislation, the Department of Defense or this federal government can step in and take control of infrastructure like this in circumstances where it’s deemed necessary for purposes of defense,” Turnbull added.
The Defense Department and the Australian Security Intelligence Organization, the main domestic spy agency, have since publicly supported the contract, which was signed a year after Chinese President Xi Jinping visited Australia in a highwater mark in bilateral relations.
Relations have plummeted since, although there have been signs of stabilization since the current Australian government’s election.
A parliamentary committee recommended in 2021 that the then government consider restoring Australian control of the port if the lease were contrary to the national interest. The government responded by holding a review that found no grounds for ending the lease.
But the federal regulator of foreign ownership, the Foreign Investment Review Board, gained new powers to block similar deals in the future.
The board could not intervene in the Darwin Port deal because the asset was government-owned rather than privately owned and was leased rather than sold.
veryGood! (38)
Related
- Arizona Supreme Court declines emergency request to extend ballot ‘curing’ deadline
- Conditions starting to 'deteriorate' in La. as Hurricane Francine nears: Live updates
- Addison Rae Is Only Wearing Underwear at the 2024 MTV VMAs
- An Ohio city reshaped by Haitian immigrants lands in an unwelcome spotlight
- Former North Carolina labor commissioner becomes hospital group’s CEO
- Judge disqualifies Cornel West from running for president in Georgia
- Tyreek Hill calls for firing of police officer involved in Sunday's incident
- Katy Perry takes aim at critics, thanks Orlando Bloom for 'doing the dishes' in VMAs speech
- My Chemical Romance returns with ‘The Black Parade’ tour
- Oklahoma State coach Mike Gundy delivers truth bomb about reality of paying players
Ranking
- He failed as a service dog. But that didn't stop him from joining the police force
- Boeing factory workers are voting whether to strike and shut down aircraft production
- Omaha school shooting began with a fight between 2 boys, court documents say
- James McAvoy's positively toxic 'Speak No Evil' villain was 'a tricky gift'
- Georgia's humbling loss to Mississippi leads college football winners and losers for Week 11
- A Colorado man is charged with arson in a wildfire that destroyed 26 homes
- The Sundance Film Festival may get a new home. Here are the 3 finalists
- 71-year-old boater found dead in Grand Canyon, yet another fatality at the park in 2024
Recommendation
-
Cruise ship rescues 4 from disabled catamaran hundreds of miles off Bermuda, officials say
-
Taylor Swift endorsed Kamala Harris on Instagram. Caitlin Clark, Oprah and more approved.
-
2024 MTV VMAs: Shawn Mendes Adorably Reveals Who He Brought as Date on Red Carpet
-
Man accused of starting Line Wildfire in California arrested as crews battle blaze
-
Unexpected pairing: New documentary tells a heartwarming story between Vietnam enemies
-
Southern Baptist trustees back agency president but warn against needless controversy
-
Linkin Park setlist: All songs in the From Zero World Tour kickoff with Emily Armstrong
-
Caitlin Clark 'likes' Taylor Swift's endorsement of Kamala Harris on social media